PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of COVID-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in person, via telephone or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options. 

Lins Law Group, P.A.

Get Out Ahead Of Your Issue
— Call Us Today

813-280-0082

Planning. Preparation. And Acting With Purposeful Intent.

Are there any exceptions to Florida’s “non-claim” statute?

On Behalf of | May 29, 2014 | Probate |

While Florida’s non-claim statute is viewed as being harsh due to its consequences if not followed in a timely fashion, there are some exceptions in which certain claims are not barred.

Florida’s non-claim statute set forth in Section 733.702 of Florida Statutes provides that if a creditor fails to timely file their claim within the allowed period, the claim is barred and unenforceable. The statute also provides that a creditor can, on certain grounds, get an extension from the probate court. However, even without an extension, there are a few exceptions. There is nothing in the non-claim statute which affects or prevents: (a) a proceeding to enforce any mortgage, security interest, or other lien on property of the decedent ; (b) to the limits of casualty insurance protection only, any proceeding to establish liability that is protected by the casualty insurance ; or (c) the filing of a cross-claim or counterclaim against the estate in an action instituted by the estate-but no recovery on a cross-claim or counterclaim shall exceed the estate’s recovery in that action.

Under these exceptions, a mortgage holder does not have to file a claim in order to be able to foreclose on a defaulted mortgage or security interest. However, if the mortgage company wishes to pursue a deficiency, they should file a claim. Also, a claimant may pursue a claim for damages-to the extent there is insurance coverage-without having to file a claim. However, experienced lawyers would advise filing a claim anyway just to protect one’s rights. In fact, many experienced lawyers would err on the side of filing a claim rather than running the risk of their rights being barred.

Archives

FindLaw Network